![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Craig thanks for sharing this. I see the pressures and velocities as "period correct" for the short ten with 1 1/8 ounce load and they are great loadings for composite barrel guns and with a powder that has and should be available for a long time to come. I also believe this data shows that if one uses their head good short ten loads have and can be wildcatted. I will add these to 2 7/8" reloading data spreadsheet, very helpful since many of the powders on the existing data are obsolete.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Craig, I don't load for Ten, but I do for 12,16&20 so am interested in seeing everyone's data. To what do you attribute the jump in pressure in #2 ?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
My guess would be the Remington hulls.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
The only difference is the remington hulls. The remington and cheddite hulls have similar internal volume but the plastic used on the cheddite hulls is softer more of a low density polyethylene. You will note that I had to add card wads to these loads versus 7625 because the red dot takes up much less room. Remington hulls have a larger rim diameter and will not chamber in my LC smith guns. Not a problem with federal and cheddite. So I plan to standardize on the cheddite hull since they are cheaper and very durable plus I obtain cheddite hulls from my non reloading buddies that shoot RST,s.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Craig Larter For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Thanks, Craig. Hard to believe that the wall section of the Chedite and Federal shells can absorb as much as 800 psi. I'll admit, it's something I Never gave any thought to in 50 years of reloading.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I have not handled a Cheddite 10ga hull, what is the base wad made of? Federal hulls with their fiber/paper base wads are known for lower pressures.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Cheddite has a plastic base wad.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
I think a better question is why does a Federal hull produce lower pressure with all things being roughly equal, it's the fiber base wad, 89% the pressure of a Remington and 93% the pressure of a Cheditte in this test with Red Dot.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|