Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Reproductions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-12-2025, 03:53 PM   #21
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 3,314
Thanked 13,076 Times in 3,463 Posts

Default

If it was an upgrade (I am probably going with Brian's post, that it is not) by DelGrego and Runge, it will likely have Runge's signature hidden in a border. The GI pics aren't clear enough to show it though.
Steve, post a picture of the bottom of the receiver, focusing on the forward two screws.

edit: Blowing up the GI picture of the trigger plate does not show Runge's signature.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-12-2025, 03:57 PM   #22
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,686
Thanks: 38,046
Thanked 35,418 Times in 13,015 Posts

Default

Runge did not identify lower grade upgrades with his signature Edgar. He only did that on the high grade upgrades.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 03-12-2025, 04:50 PM   #23
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,347
Thanks: 6,625
Thanked 9,698 Times in 5,150 Posts

Default

Dean missed the PS stamp when he proclaimed that the gun was a D grade. Further, we haven't seen any good pictures of the rib or the extension. Neat gun.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-12-2025, 05:40 PM   #24
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,686
Thanks: 38,046
Thanked 35,418 Times in 13,015 Posts

Default

Yes I did Bill - Thanks for pointing that out… PS = Parker Special Steel soecifically for the Grade-2 guns.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-12-2025, 06:54 PM   #25
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,071
Thanks: 4,454
Thanked 2,964 Times in 949 Posts

Default

I have a few newb questions. How does that stock come off, by removing the (2) tang and trigger guard screws? With no through bolt? I'm guessing not, but are the extractor changeable to ejectors? Can the auto safety be easily disabled?

If I decided to remove the checkered butt and install a pad, what would be considered correct? I like a black Pachmayr SC pad but maybe some red/orange/brown pad would be a better choice. I'm not sold on leather covered pads, just personal preference.

Lastly, how do SK IN and SK OUT translate as far as choke constriction? It seems like it might mean different thing from different manufacturers? I've shot 50 skeet and 50 SC targets and it seemed break 'em just fine.

Steve,

To answer some of your questions which I don't think have been answered:

1. No through bolt. Trigger guard off. Floor plate has to come off. Hammers and springs removed. Two screws through stock. Instructions on this site. Why do it?
2. You would buy another gun before converting one to ejector.
3. Auto safety can be done away with, but stock has to be removed and barrel for tang screw removed from wood to remove rod. Not worth it unless you have correct screwdrivers and knowledge to do it.
4. Please, Please do not cut that checkered butt under any circumstances.
5. .615 is a 20 gauge bore. Have someone measure the bore/constriction. right barrel is skeet out (longer shot), should be tighter than the left for skeet in (closer shot). You may find both close to the same, but far less than .010 (ten thousandths) constriction in both. Skeet in may be close to cylinder, skeet out more choke. Only way to know is to measure them. Thus for hunting say quail from underfoot with this gun you would shoot left first, then right.

You could never "create" this gun for what you paid for it. Vent rib, GH Grade 2, reblued barrels and parts, case hardening, checkered new wood, checkered butt, and a new beaver tail forearm. Not counting opening chokes, etc. I would love to own and hunt with this gun. The only thing you really need to do is to measure the barrel thickness to make sure someone did not hone/polish the barrels and make them too thin.
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 03-12-2025, 08:46 PM   #26
Member
Rick Roemer
PGCA Member
 
Rick Roemer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 412
Thanks: 433
Thanked 613 Times in 199 Posts

Default

My opinion is you have a very nice first Parker. I don’t think you have over paid. I love the checkered butt, beavertail, and chokes. Determining collectibility and originality is a long acquired skill. This comes from lots of looking, lots of reading, and lots of talking to senior members. From your post it seems it checks a lot of boxes for your personal taste. I like this gun as an excellent shooter! Join our club and get more involved! There’s not a better place to be.
__________________
A Dog, A Gun, and Time enough!

George Bird Evans
Rick Roemer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rick Roemer For Your Post:
Unread 03-14-2025, 05:21 PM   #27
Member
10 bore
PGCA Member
 
scott kittredge's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 7,751
Thanked 2,584 Times in 845 Posts

Default

This gun is better than a repro and a great price for what you have.
__________________
No man laid on his death bed and said,"I wished I would have worked more"
scott kittredge is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to scott kittredge For Your Post:
Unread 03-15-2025, 07:16 AM   #28
Member
David C Porter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 219
Thanks: 39
Thanked 252 Times in 86 Posts

Default

I agree with Brian that it's been heavily modified & is a shooter. So, if you need longer lenght of pull or comfort from recoil go ahead and add a period pad. You're not going to hurt the value since it's already been modified and has lost it's collectors value. Like going to Pep Boys & adding chrome rims & flame striping to a Mercedes. You don't get your money back & desirability on resale goes down. Enjoy it as a shooter.
David C Porter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.